Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:32

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
S&P 500 futures rise ahead of May jobs report: Live updates - CNBC
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How could Trump, with his deplorable garbage supporters, manage to win an election?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Do you believe that Jesus was God on Earth?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Iure eveniet quod quae esse explicabo autem corrupti.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
CM Punk makes John Cena’s WWE title reign interesting by delivering the Truth - Cageside Seats
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ryan Lochte’s wife Kayla reveals ‘painful’ divorce after seven years of marriage - New York Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How the Indiana Pacers Spun Style Into Substance - The Ringer
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.